Identify where execution gaps, data blind spots, and organizational constraints could undermine returns — and receive a disciplined, resource-aware 100-Day plan designed to prevent misallocated spend and delayed exits.
Most portfolio companies underperform not because of strategy or market demand, but because action is taken before systems, data, and ownership are ready. Inconsistent execution, unclear accountability, and unreliable reporting create false confidence — increasing the risk of deploying capital in the wrong places.
In today’s environment, the cost of a wrong move is higher than the cost of waiting. Execution missteps increase CAC, distort forecasts, slow value-creation timelines, and introduce avoidable variance into fund returns — all under greater IC and LP scrutiny.
The GTM Execution-Risk Audit provides an operator-ready view of where action is safe, where it should be paused, and where limited resources will have the highest confidence impact — typically narrowing focus to 3–7 defensible priorities aligned to capital sequencing and execution feasibility.
We identify where revenue assumptions break down — including ownership gaps, accountability failures, and misalignment between GTM activity and financial outcomes.
Outcome: OPs receive a quantified EBITDA exposure range and clarity on where organizational drag increases execution-risk.
We assess whether current demand and pipeline activity reflects real buyer intent or inflated signal — and whether acquisition costs are defensible in a constrained capital environment.
Outcome: Leaders know which investments to maintain, reduce, or pause without adding budget.
We map how prospects actually move through the system and identify where velocity slows, decisions stall, or revenue recognition becomes unpredictable.
Outcome: Fixes are sequenced by financial risk and dependency, not intuition.
We evaluate whether decision rights, operating cadence, and leadership bandwidth can support execution — or whether performance is being propped up by heroics.
Outcome: OPs know whether the GTM engine can safely absorb capital or whether leadership capacity is the constraint.
We determine where automation reduces labor drag and improves signal quality — and where AI introduces operational or reporting risk.
Outcome: Clear cost-avoidance and efficiency opportunities tied directly to EBITDA protection.
We assess whether systems produce decision-grade reporting — including forecast accuracy, CRM reliability, and attribution integrity.
Outcome: Operators gain visibility within 14–30 days and manage performance instead of interpreting noise.
We benchmark maturity across teams and against portfolio norms to determine urgency, sequencing, and capital allocation priority.
Outcome: OPs can defend timing, focus, and intervention decisions in IC and board discussions.
Minimal leadership time required. We independently gather funnel, CRM, channel, and org insights.
We surface GTM, operational, and leadership friction points—plus early EBITDA opportunities.
You receive a 1–10 GTM Maturity Score mapped to 8 AI-accelerated levels.
A complete plan: prioritized levers, feasibility analysis, talent recommendations, and an EBITDA model.
Pre-Close Option Available
Can be conducted pre-close with limited access to de-risk underwriting and surface GTM risks early.
Comparable scoring across portcos to prioritize high-impact opportunities.
Clear visibility into GTM mechanics, operational constraints, and leadership readiness.
We identify what’s realistic within 100-days based on team capacity and org structure.
A standardized diligence model deployable across 5–20 portcos.
Reduced CAC by 32% within 90 days for a $20M B2B services portfolio company.
“Alpenglo surfaced $8–12M in EBITDA upside within 60 days and exposed execution-risks that had been invisible inside our dashboards. Their 100-day plan became the backbone of our value-creation workstream.”
— Operating Partner, $1B+ Fund
One GTM system correction paid for the audit in 45 days. They work like an embedded operating partner—clear, direct, and focused on decisions that move EBITDA.”
— CEO, PE-Backed SaaS Company
Get a 30-day operator-grade GTM diagnostic that identifies revenue leakage and 3–7 prioritized value-creation levers.
| Cookie | Duration | Description |
|---|---|---|
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
| viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |